So more tests you have the increased likelihood them picking up on infections. Yes of course lol. Who would argue that? Yet when someone here had two "low" positives on IGG and one negative on WB that was the end it all. Why not tell the person to take another WB test from months from now to be on the safe side?
I see already that there is a person here who tested low positive on IGG, then negative on WB, then months later tested indeterminate on WB. If WB is the end it all then it should have been negative negative.
Also on the experts forum there is a lady who had 1.52 HSV II, then two weeks later has a 4.82, then 1.39 about two months later.
Does that make any sense?
ottmar...told you before you don't have any reason to retest. the odds of false negatives on multiple tests are incredibly low. The more tests you have, the increased likelihood of them picking up on infections just 1 single test might miss.
genx7- as I said previously, folks who have had obvious symptoms and have no reason to doubt their results don't come seeking help on the forums which is why it seems so unbalanced as to low positives.
grace
Grace,
Any ideas why orr if the study in the link I posted is correct? Cause that woud cause a few people to get really really nervous.
Seems that you can drop out of detectable range for HSV, seems to be more prevalent for HSV1. But what still shocks me is the 78% that will be detectable for HSV1 when it comes to ELISA. And this is after 6 months.........
It's also interesting to see that Herpeselect test was more accurate than the WB during the first 3 months. For HSV 2 a huge difference.
Seems like there is a whole gray area in testing...............this royally sucks.