Bilateral vs. symmetrical vs. mirror. All very confusing, and still confusing to me after lo! these many years. What makes it even more puzzling to me is that I started out with more or less symmetrical symptoms, but now they're less so. Or actually, some stuff on one side has gotten worse and some stuff on the other side has also gotten worse, but not the same stuff. And they *still* haven't found any definite spinal lesions, despite my having symptoms that almost certainly are from the spinal cord. Go figure. Also, I have several issues that are not a matter of 'side,' such as bladder, perspiration, and so on.
It seems to me that though there are some absolutes in MS, there aren't very many. That's absolute! Here's an old thread that talks about this sort of thing in detail.
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/Multiple-Sclerosis/What-Kinds-of-Symptoms-Dont-Sound-Like-MS/show/856407
ess
Just a note: Bilateral MS symptoms may not be the norm, but they do exist. My initial presenting symptom was bilateral numbness in my feet and lower legs.
I'm not seeing MS either, and you mention your problems being bilateral (both sides) and MS usually picks one side or the other.
Other than that, I totally agree with our other forum members
The main problem seems to be fatigue, and MS is usually diagnosed with multi-focal symptoms (in more than one place.) Fatigue can be from many sources, including heart trouble.
Hi there,
As others have previously answered......Yes you can!
Though from what you have described, I'm thinking like ess and I don't think it sounds specific enough (or match's up) for MS to be likely, especially when there are so many other more common non-neurological conditions/issues that it could be. MS has many mimics and when you google symptoms, MS will usually come up somewhere because the sx's are so varied.
More often than not, sx's are medically explained by the more common and if as you say, you "can see a reason for each of these" because of prior diagnosis's and medication etc. then the more likely explanation is probably what you already know. I would be first getting my dr to investigate if your previous leg infection, could of caused something like a vascular issue, peripheral neuropathy etc, whilst continuing to loose weight and improve your fitness and general health, 'if' they are still possibly contributing to the problem.
Cheers........JJ
You can not only get MS at 47, you can get it at 87, or at least be diagnosed with it. Sometimes people have 'odd' symptoms beforehand for many years, and sometimes they are of relatively recent vintage, but there certainly are cases of diagnosis in the 80s, so don't let age be part of your equation when you are 'only' 47.
Having said that, though, I have to add that from your brief description, MS doesn't seem terribly likely. There are so many other things it could be as well. I do agree that you need a good neurological work-up, if only to eliminate that one possibility.
ess
ess
Hi CnJ-
The answer to your question is yes, and no :-) What I mean is that it is certainly possible to be diagnosed with MS at age 47, but you'd likely have had it from a much younger age.
I was diagnosed at 51 and it was determined that my first MS episode was 20 years earlier! Some of what you describe could be attributed to MS. But it could have many other causes as well. I would suggest that you find an MS specialist and get a complete neurological work up.
Kyle
Actually, people have been diagnosed with MS,in their 60's,due to the fact that it just wasn't found earlier.
Have you seen a neurologist yet?!There are other diseases that mimic MS,so you would need to be seen by a specialist that can determine just what is causing your symptoms.