Remember people are individual. I have had MS for over 50 years. I was stabled for 40+ years now it is starting to kick in again. I have gait problems and My arms and legs jerk. I throw the phone by accident. I freaked myself when I was being diagnosed with MS I read demyelating and brain stem and freaked out. I had months until a doctor explained it. Hopefully you will have an answer sooner than later. This may be part of it.
Alex
Please don't make the mistake of jumping the gun and assuming a "tiny cervical syrinx" has significance when it just may be too small to be affecting your spinal cord!
SM does have treatment options, so it's not true that SM is "not treatable".......if there are basically 2 different types and you don't have chari malformation, then from what i understand it's unlikely to be developmental SM, but a syrinx can also occur as "a complication of trauma, meningitis, tumor, arachnoiditis, or a tethered spinal cord. In these cases the syrinx forms in the section of the spinal cord damaged by these conditions. As more people are surviving spinal cord injuries, more cases of post-traumatic SM are being diagnosed as the syrinx can form years after the trauma."
http://asap.org/index.php/disorders/syringomyelia/
Try to keep in mind that for the syrinx to be 'the' cause of all your symptoms and require surgical treatment, it would need to be large enough to interrupt the signal that goes through your spinal cord just like any other spinal related symptom causation does eg MS/TM cord lesions, cord compression etc. The goal of surgery is to remove the pressure the syrinx places on your spinal cord and to restore the normal flow of cerebrospinal fluid (surgery usually cannot reverse 'severe' neurologic deterioration).
The questions i'd be asking if your appointment goes as your expecting (a) why hasn't this syrinx shown up on any of my prior spinal MRI's? (b) If it's developmental and asymptomatic, why am i experiencing neurological symptoms at my age now? (c) If a neurologist looks for a neurological explanation of symptoms and finally finds something neurologically wrong, how can that potential explanation be so easily ruled out? (d) if this is 'tiny', what exactly makes this a tiny asymptomatic syrinx and not a tiny symptomatic cervical cord MS lesion?
http://brain.oxfordjournals.org/content/131/7/1776
interesting study on syrinx and MS
It would probably be in your best interest to take a step back, IF reading other peoples scary syrinx stories has already got you scared or devastated for your future, your anxiety is more likely feeding, worst case scenarios and fear based thoughts are not "reality"........breath!
Hugs.........JJ
((Hugs)) Sent you an email -- thinking of you.
Cheryl
Hi Karen,
It is a bit of a puzzle....if this tiny cervical syrinx has been there throughout your life and is asymptomatic, why wasn't it visible or mentioned on your previous MRI's is a very good question....
I think the 'asymptomatic' part has probably got a lot to do with your symptom pattern and clinical signs not matching what's expected with a 'cervical syrinx' that is symptomatic.....sensory disturbance is typically asymmetric in a cape-like pattern over the shoulders and back, pain is frequently felt in the neck and shoulders and it usually starts with sensory and motor weakness in the fingers and hands, later signs include the shoulders, trunk, and even later it starts effecting the legs.
The more common associations when it's developmental is Scoliosis (abnormal spinal curvature) and 'Chari' (malformation of the lower part of the brain) Chari is also one of the MS mimics, i don't know much about syrinx beyond that., sorry!
One thing to keep in mind that when 'symptom progression' is caused by a neurological condition, the abnormal neurological clinical signs should be corroborating the decline, so IF the associated test evidence has been normal or stable during the same time frame, it's likely more of an indication that it's not due to an underlying neurological condition and adds weight to alternative causes. That's not to say the progression isn't happening, just that it becomes doubtful the causation is primarily neurological, if that makes sense.
HUGS........JJ