Thanks to both of you for your help and thank you teak for that helpful resource from the cdc and thank you nurse girl for your info as we'll. I am conclusively negative!!!
You have to understand that all the phone reps do at the CDC is read off of a script. They just parrot the exact same info as is found on their website, and they're not required to have any kind of knowledge base regarding HIV.
3 months is conclusive, and actually, the vast majority of newly infected people will test + a good bit before 3 months. With the sensitivity of the modern tests, it usually only takes a few weeks for a test to become +. If your 3 month test is negative, you absolutely positively do NOT have HIV.
It doesn't and hasn't since 2004.
http://www.cdc.gov/globalaids/Resources/pmtct-care/docs/TM/Module_6TM.pdf
Page 11
#4
In an adult, a positive HIV antibody test result means that the person is infected, a person with a negative or inconclusive result may be in the “window for 4 to 6 weeks but occasionally up to 3 months after HIV exposure. Persons at high risk who initially test negative should be retested 3 months after exposure to confirm results
Yes I feel really good about this result but why does the cdc representative say to test at 6 months again? Who does the 6 month window period apply to
Your 3 month test would be conclusive if you had an exposure. You do not need an further testing.
Why did the person for the cdc tell me to test again at 6 months? They said only 97 persent of people at 3 months.
I recieved a negative oraquick oral test at 12 weeks or 3 months but I don't know if I should test again as the representative from the cdc said to test at 6 months.
The window period is 4 weeks to 3 months.