teak lizzylou and nursegirl i have a quetion

[confused200912]

what can you say about these websites? what do you think about them?

http://www.managingdesire.org/oralsexriskfactors.html

http://www.managingdesire.org/oralsexitsuptoyou.html

please please i need your evaluations

[LIZZIE LOU]

NO ONE HAS EVER CONTRACTED HIV FROM ORAL SEX.  PERIOD ! ! ! ! !

this post is over ! ! !

[confused200912]

please don't get me wrong. I'm not questioning your statements. I'm just seeing two sides of the argument. Thank you for response :)

[confused200912]

intriguing for all of us. Because people here keep saying that it's no risk but here we have an alleged case.

[LIZZIE LOU]

"And oral sex is basically safe sex -- completely safe with respect to HIV and although not zero risk for other STDs, the chance of infection is far lower than for unprotected vaginal or anal sex.  Please educate yourself about the real risks.  If you stick with oral sex and condom-protected vaginal or anal sex, you have no HIV worries and very little worry about other STDs. "   DR HANSFIELD  

"I am sure you can find lots of people who belive that HIV is transmitted by oral sex, but you will not find scientific data to support this unrealistic concern..."   DR HOOK

you have been assessed as not having a risk...kindly move on...our answers will not change.

[Teak]

For whom is it intriguing for? It's really getting very old.

[confused200912]

but you have to admit this is very intriguing. The doctor did not even questioned him.

[Teak]

NO..

[confused200912]

why don't you bring that up to the expert forum and ask?

[confused200912]

let's clear this. Is there a difference in risk between receptive or insertive oral?

[LIZZIE LOU]

what "dr bob" on thebody states is of NO concern to THIS forum.

[Teak]

Do you know that person? Have you been with him and you know his sexual history? End of discussion.

[Vernod]

sorry, didnt know it was already in the thread.....my bad.

[Vernod]

I don't know where Dr. Hook got that from, but check out this post on thebody.com.  It can happen and has.

http://www.thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SafeSex/Current/Q205768.html

[gaz688]

That guy is living proof that he is wrong. I am hoping in a week that I will not be further proof.

[LIZZIE LOU]

Dr Hook:

"HIV is not spread by touching, masturbation, oral sex or condom protected sex."

[gaz688]

We are looking for your views as we respect them

[Teak]

Take it to the anxiety forum.

[gaz688]

What about this guy then?

http://www.thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/SafeSex/Current/Q205768.html

[confused200912]

Oh teak, you are very impressive. I wish I could be like you and I hope not be swayed by anxiety. Thanks and happy holidays!

[Teak]

by H. Hunter Handsfield, M.D.  , Dec 18, 2009 10:28AM
There is no debate (among experts) about the HIV risks associated with oral sex.  The risk is so low that almost nobody who cares for HIV infected patients has ever had a patient believed to have been infected that way.  Among experts, it's a semantic issue about using terms like "no risk" and "very low risk".  There is no difference between my or Dr. Hook's use of "low risk" and other experts' "no risk".

[confused200912]

just finished reading  the doctors' comments in the expert forum. Why do they keep saying it's a low risk and not a no risk? sorry I'm quite confused...don't they moderate the expert contributors here to tell "low risk" rather than "no risk"?

[Teak]

You were advised that we were done with this discussion and the website that you posted is not a reliable or scientific website.

[confused200912]

can you stop answering like that? people here are not as knowledgeable as you are we need to be educated.

[Teak]

· Anyone who continues to post excessively, questioning a conclusive negative result or no-risk situation, will be subject to action by MedHelp. Conclusive negative results or a no-risk situation will be based up the criteria MedHelp’s doctors. Action will be taken as follows:
* After excessive posting, a warning will be issued by MedHelp
* Continuing to post regarding the negative result / no risk situation will result in a 3 day suspension
* Continuing to post upon your return will result in a permanent ban.