NO risk means no risk...you don't have an HIV concern, period.
Move on!
Dear nurse girl
I need the answers of my question...From yr way u r confident ,let it make in my way please
You mean to say menstrual blood do not posses hiv virus
and r u sure I will notice unbroken condom as I m not much sure of any leakage or tears
And what about my arm which I touched at first on blood n then on my penis
This is not an emergency service, and the regular participants who volunteer their time are not health professionals and do not provide treatment advice. And any and all decisions about PEP must be made locally, by a doc or clinic familiar with local epidemiology of HIV and only after direct professional interation with the patient.
You describe a no risk exposure. Menstrual blood is no more infectious for HIV than vaginal secretions without blood, and having either one on the outside of a condom does not increase HIV risk. A broken condom is always very obvious; you would not miss it.
You really don't need HIV testing after an event like this. But if you feel you need it for reassurance, you don't need to wait 3 months. The standard 3rd generation HIV blood tests detect virtually all infections by 6-8 weeks, and the duo test (for both HIV antibody and p24 antigen) is conclusive any time 4 weeks or more after exposure.
Reply fast i have 3 he left :-(((