thanks for that stat but is less then that i did look up the number of people with hiv since 2007 from where i live and there was a Very small amount living with hiv/aids in my age group about 30 or 40 cases total. so sum it all up now i think about it my risk of hiv is like winning the lottery 5 times in a row lol. yea once again sorry for wasting your time but i apprecite yours and everyone elses answer
i dont have doubts at all anymore i did at one point but that was when i first thought about the whole thing which was a year ago. i just wanted to know from other ppl who have more experice with these situations have to say if i should get tested. the way i see it is that if i was at risk she would have tested positive. like i said we were both each others 1st and never cheated on each other. but yea if u wasted your time by all of this i apologize.
The prevalence of HIV in women in Pima County is less than 1 in 1000.
And anyway it doesn't matter; she tested negative.
You don't sound like you are at risk but since you obviously have doubts then why not test.
well i mean i guess what im trying to figure out is that are my chances of having hiv are 0? i mean it does sound silly because once again she was the only person i had unprotected sex with and we both didn't have other partners and like i said it makes a bigger difference that she did get tested a year later. Also once again where i live could make a huge difference also. lol i freak out about the littlest things
To play it safe and to relieve your doubts test.
so would it not be needed to test?
yea i don't think she would lie about something like this and i saw the test results myself
I would not worry about HIV due to the fact of her test result 1 year later if you can trust her that she was telling the truth.