I think a mediator is a good idea, but like NG said, then they'd be arguing over who is qualified to be considered for the position.
Personally, I think this is something that will eventually have to be decided between the 2 factions. I think it is possible, but everyone is still holding everything too close to the chest yet. Nobody is willing to drop their guard in order to consider something that might go against party lines.
True enough,lol.
This is really a stretch for me. I know nothing about these sort of politics, I feel like I am learning the alphabet. I have little pieces but I cannot see the larger picture on how the Government (this Govt) runs and negotiates to keep running.
Out of my league,here. If you all can put up with an occasional dense question, I hope to learn something.
Great idea, rivil...only they would get hung up agreeing on that 3rd party person. lol
I hope this doesn't seem to be too silly of a question...
If it is "the result of disparate realities.", which strikes me as true, then perhaps a solution would be to bring in a third party to sort of mediate?
I laugh out loud at the idea myself, but it seems that there is so little trust and that they are so into the game playing that maybe they should have a panel of bipartisan experts who could advise them on how to proceed and make things work..
A lot of objections rise in my mind thinking about his idea, but the country is split, the Gov. is split, there has got to be some sort of bridge building, maybe outside of our elected leaders. What a mess.
"Almost rational" is only appropriate if both sides are capable of reason/rational thinking which is only possible if the parties have a shared or very similar reality. I think we are seeing the result of disparate realities.