Okay, now, you're all pressing my buttons! Breathe....nope, I gotta get up and stompa around the room for a bit!
Okay, I'm back. Still piping mad --- and angry, of course, too.
If a doctor reports in the medical record that he did an exam when he didn't - he is committing flagrant medical fraud. If this results in you not getting the care you need it begins to include medical malpractice. If he "billed" for an exam he did not do it also includes insurance fraud. You can get the billing question answered by contacting your insurance company.
At the VERY LEAST he deserves a letter of complaint sent to the State Board of Medical Examiners for your state. Do not defeat yourself in advance by believing that the body will automatically discard your statement over the doctor's word. They may or may not, but they will contact him for his statement. At the very least it will remind him to touch a patient before claiming to have done an exam. Here is a list of the various boards for the states:
http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/2645.html
But, I also believe that a letter to your insurance company is also in order. They get very upset about insurance fraud. If you were on Medicare it becomes a federal offense, I think.
nncdalton (nancy?) - I have gone off "ad infinitum" about the myth that there is no pain in MS. I will try to find the last thread in which I sputtered my way into hand fatigue countering that bit of total nonsense. Here is that thread. Mine is the second post:
http://www.medhelp.org/posts/show/612090
Julie - You know how I feel about dismissing MS based on some arbitrary time in which the lesions do or do not change. This is a question I would like to see put to Dr. Kantor, if he would answer it. That is, within the field of clinical MS care is there an expectation that a person with MS with have an increase in lesions within a few months or even a few years? In other words, if the lesions don't change in 3-months, 1 year, or 3 years can it be said with any certainty that the person does not have MS?
Now, I have to defend your PCP a little on the point of not knowing that the neurologist was an idiot. It is impossible for a general practitioner to know the specifics of all the diseases, conditions and variations out there. That is why we have specialists. We try to choose specialists for our patients that are good, so we can depend on their judgment.
Most general practitioners will not see a great number of MS patients and thus will not have occasion to learn all about the disease.
I think you had other reasons for firing her, but I had to do a reality check there.
Well, my circulation is improved and I have had my exercise for the day.
Carry on.
Quix