Has anyone had a successful 3 level spinal fusion? I have had a laminectomy at L4-5-a microdiscectomy at L2-3 and then 1 wk later I had 2 herniated disks at L2-3 and 3-4. It has now been 2 yrs and I am in pain again-can hardly walk as I have major pain in my quad muscle and fire in my shin. My shin has been numb for 2 yrs but the firery pain goes thru. I have been told that my only choice is a 3 level fusion with bmp(L2,3 L3.4 L4.5). I am very scared to do this-I am wondering what the real recovery is on this. I have also had major colon surgery so the dr says that he will go thru my side rather than the front or back-i have read that the recovery is quicker when they go thru laterally.
There is not good evidence to support different approaches to fusion, and the evidence to support any surgery at all is weak. This is a good review of the literature regarding fusion (not specifically 3 level fusion):
TI Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane Review.
AU Gibson JN; Waddell G
SO Spine 2005 Oct 15;30(20):2312-20.
STUDY DESIGN: An updated Cochrane review. OBJECTIVE: To review current scientific evidence on the effectiveness of surgical interventions for degenerative lumbar spondylosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is still limited scientific evidence on spinal surgery. METHODS: Use of standard Cochrane review methods to analyze all randomized controlled trials published to March 31, 2005. RESULTS: A total of 31 randomized controlled trials were identified. Most of the earlier trials reported mainly surgical outcomes; more of the recent trials also reported patient-centered outcomes of pain or disability. There is still very little information on occupational outcomes or long-term outcomes beyond 2-3 years. Seven heterogeneous trials on spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, and nerve compression permitted limited conclusions. There were two new trials on fusion that showed conflicting results. One trial showed that fusion gave better clinical outcomes than conventional physiotherapy, and the other showed that fusion was no better than a modern exercise and rehabilitation program. There were 8 trials that showed that instrumented fusion produces a higher fusion rate, but any improvement in clinical outcomes is probably marginal. CONCLUSIONS: No conclusions are possible about the relative effectiveness of anterior, posterior, or circumferential fusion. The preliminary results of three small trials of intradiscal electrotherapy suggest it is ineffective, except possibly in highly selected patients. Preliminary data from three trials of disc arthroplasty do not permit firm conclusions.
AD The Spinal Unit, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. j.n.a.gibson @ ed.ac.uk
The Content on this Site is presented in a summary fashion, and is intended to be used for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be interpreted as medical advice or a diagnosis of any health or fitness problem, condition or disease; or a recommendation for a specific test, doctor, care provider, procedure, treatment plan, product, or course of action. Med Help International, Inc. is not a medical or healthcare provider and your use of this Site does not create a doctor / patient relationship. We disclaim all responsibility for the professional qualifications and licensing of, and services provided by, any physician or other health providers posting on or otherwise referred to on this Site and/or any Third Party Site. Never disregard the medical advice of your physician or health professional, or delay in seeking such advice, because of something you read on this Site. We offer this Site AS IS and without any warranties. By using this Site you agree to the following Terms and Conditions. If you think you may have a medical emergency, call your physician or 911 immediately.